HMRC lost a first tier tribunal case

As ย Stockport accountants, we advise on many different topics, including expenses. And it’s not too often that HMRC are wrong surrounding this topic, however they recently lost a first tier tribunal case on the recovery of VAT on the purchase of six cars.

Although most VAT registered businesses are able to recover the VAT on the purchase of commercial vehicles the rules for the recovery on a car state two conditions must be met:

  • the vehicle must be used exclusively for business purposes and
  • it is not made available for private use.

In the case of Zone Contractors Ltd the court accepted that six cars were not available for private use which allowed the business to successfully recover the VAT on the six cars.

The business had a strongly worded contract of employment that prevented employees from using company cars for private travel. Thisย was the crucial factor in this case and allowed the business to recover over ยฃ27,000 in input VAT on the purchase of six new cars.

The tribunal was satisfied that the cars were wholly used for business purposes and were not available for private use. The tribunal also rejected HMRCโ€™s argument that the company had failed to demonstrate that the cars were not available for private use.

Other factors which were relevant:

  • The Tribunal was satisfied that all employees signed a contract when they first joined the company, which included the following โ€˜It is hereby strictly forbidden for the Employee to use the Company vehicle for any personal use inside/outside their employment hoursโ€™.
  • The six cars were always kept overnight at the companyโ€™s offices or were left on site.
  • Zone Contractors carry out groundwork projects and the vehicles were appropriate for for site based work.
  • The taxpayer also successfully counteracted HMRCโ€™s argument that the insurance cover of the vehicles included use for โ€˜social, domestic and pleasureโ€™ (SDP), and was not just restricted to business use. But the tribunal accepted it was impossible to have a business only policy without the SDP clause.
  • HMRC also put forward an argument that private use of a car would include detours to buy โ€˜cigarettes or lunch while out on a business journey or even going off site to collect lunchโ€™. The tribunal concluded that such use could be ignored as de minimis.
  • The intended use of the car at the time it is purchased is crucial. The private use issue means that either a legal restriction to prevent such use or a physical restriction must be in place.

HMRC may appeal against the decision.

For more information about what expenses you can claim, please contact the team at IN-Accountancy on 0161 456 9666 or by email atย ย askus@in-accountancy.co.uk.

For more information on this tribunal case: Tribunal decision

Let’s start a conversationย 

    Subscribe me for updates and news from In Accountancy

    Related articles

    Find out how we can help?

    Lectus scelerisque a donec tincidunt litora per eleifend eget ut sagittis conubia pharetra scelerisque dui ultricies duis parturient auctor adipiscing.

    ย 

    Let’s start a conversationย 

      Subscribe me for updates and news from In Accountancy

      IN-ACCOUNTANCY

      Search